|
|
Post by indiansgm on Dec 28, 2007 12:00:37 GMT -5
Percival 7 year min
Lilly 7 year min
2nd tag via trade with Royals 2/3/08
|
|
|
|
Post by indiansgm on Feb 7, 2008 16:04:08 GMT -5
Ted Lilly (MATCHED - 7 yr min): AAS $4M (Dodgers)
08:2.4M
09:5.6M
10:2.4M
11:4M
12:2.4M
13:5.6M
14:2.4M
|
|
|
|
Post by BK Dodgers GM (Man) on Feb 8, 2008 13:42:42 GMT -5
Ted Lilly (MATCHED - 7 yr min): AAS $4M (Dodgers) 08:2.4M 09:5.6M 10:2.4M 11:4M 12:2.4M 13:5.6M 14:2.4M That contract doesn't add up. You only have 2 years at 5.6M to balance out against 4 years at 2.4M. You'll need to add 2x1.6M = 3.2M total back into the contract somewhere. |
|
|
|
Post by BK Dodgers GM (Man) on Feb 8, 2008 13:47:59 GMT -5
troy percival 08-10 2.4m 11 4m 12-14 5.6m Sorry for the confusion. Apparently, we did already have the precedent ruling (from last year) regarding contract term limits on aging players, so Percival's contract should be 3 years (since he's age 38), not 7. |
|
|
|
Post by indiansgm on Feb 8, 2008 16:09:14 GMT -5
Ted Lilly (MATCHED - 7 yr min): AAS $4M (Dodgers) 08:2.4M 09:5.6M 10:2.4M 11:4M 12:2.4M 13:5.6M 14:2.4M That contract doesn't add up. You only have 2 years at 5.6M to balance out against 4 years at 2.4M. You'll need to add 2x1.6M = 3.2M total back into the contract somewhere. Ted Lilly (MATCHED - 7 yr min): AAS $4M (Dodgers) 08:2.4M 09:5.6M 10:5.6M 11:4M 12:2.4M 13:5.6M 14:2.4M |
|
|
|
Post by indiansgm on Feb 8, 2008 16:10:36 GMT -5
troy percival 08-10 2.4m 11 4m 12-14 5.6m Sorry for the confusion. Apparently, we did already have the precedent ruling (from last year) regarding contract term limits on aging players, so Percival's contract should be 3 years (since he's age 38), not 7. WTH, I guess I'll match it then and structure as follows: 08:$4M 09:$4M 10:$4M |
|
|
|
Post by kevin on Feb 8, 2008 19:18:13 GMT -5
Sorry for the confusion. Apparently, we did already have the precedent ruling (from last year) regarding contract term limits on aging players, so Percival's contract should be 3 years (since he's age 38), not 7. WTH, I guess I'll match it then and structure as follows: 08:$4M 09:$4M 10:$4M lmao after chastizing me for bidding that "high" on him u match? u are retarded |
|
|
|
Post by indiansgm on Feb 9, 2008 1:40:58 GMT -5
It's "chastising", and bidding $28 million dollars over 7 years on a 38 year old injury prone reliever is retarded, no doubt about it.
I can accept a 3 year risk, especially since I can trade him to a tard like you somewhere down the line before the season starts anyway.
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Feb 10, 2008 17:11:12 GMT -5
contract approved
the league office apologizes for not catching the 7 yr RFA on percival and the age thing. this does not set a precedence however we are human and make mistakes.
|
|
