|
Post by Former Rockies GM (Peter) on Sept 26, 2008 11:05:01 GMT -5
$300,000
|
|
|
Post by BK Dodgers GM (Man) on Sept 26, 2008 13:21:28 GMT -5
400K
|
|
|
Post by Former Rockies GM (Peter) on Sept 26, 2008 17:01:10 GMT -5
$450,000
|
|
|
Post by BK Dodgers GM (Man) on Sept 27, 2008 14:52:16 GMT -5
500K
|
|
|
Post by Former Rockies GM (Peter) on Sept 27, 2008 18:56:02 GMT -5
$550,000
|
|
|
Post by BK Dodgers GM (Man) on Sept 28, 2008 12:06:35 GMT -5
700K
|
|
|
Post by Former Rockies GM (Peter) on Sept 28, 2008 12:09:30 GMT -5
$750,000
|
|
|
Post by Former Rockies GM (Peter) on Sept 29, 2008 11:33:16 GMT -5
$800,000
|
|
|
Post by BK Dodgers GM (Man) on Sept 30, 2008 11:02:54 GMT -5
900K
|
|
|
Post by Former Rockies GM (Peter) on Sept 30, 2008 11:41:13 GMT -5
$1.0m
|
|
|
Post by BK Dodgers GM (Man) on Sept 30, 2008 11:58:55 GMT -5
The bidding had already moved to 500K minimum increment at 12:06pm ET.
|
|
|
Post by Former Rockies GM (Peter) on Sept 30, 2008 12:35:50 GMT -5
The bidding had already moved to 500K minimum increment at 12:06pm ET. fair enough $1.4m
|
|
|
Post by BK Dodgers GM (Man) on Sept 30, 2008 12:42:39 GMT -5
Stick a fork in him. I'm all tapped out.
|
|
|
Post by Former Rockies GM (Peter) on Sept 30, 2008 13:15:40 GMT -5
I'm going to suggest we move to a bid increment based on value rather than time. The latter is harder to remember.
|
|
|
Post by BK Dodgers GM (Man) on Sept 30, 2008 14:05:02 GMT -5
I'm going to suggest we move to a bid increment based on value rather than time. The latter is harder to remember. That sounds fine to me (and would probably be more intuitive). Something similar to the one we use in WP would probably be good.
|
|